A more detailed report of visits to the National Health Fund
M
Maciej Mydlak
Good morning,
Currently, part of the data on the National Health Fund is in the “visit report” and part in the “visit report of the National Health Fund”. So that all this makes sense and does not duplicate, you can remove the column “NFZ product” or, for example, “number of points” from the visit report and put them in the NFZ report.
Currently, the report of visits to the National Health Fund is incomplete and in total it does not give anything. And in turn, in the report of visits for clinics that do not have a contract, these data are completely unnecessary there.
The breakdown into two independent reports gives clarity on where to look for what data to look for.
The report of visits to the National Health Fund would be complete if it contained columns with data:
a) date - it is already
b) the patient - is already
c) doctor (specialist) - there is no
d) the product of the National Health Fund - there is none, it is in another report
e) the number of points of the National Health Fund - there is none, it is in another report
f) on which invoice the National Health Fund was paid - it is already
and necessarily the ability to export to an excell file.
This would be exactly what is needed to do the accounting.
This allows you to verify multiple data in one go:
- whether the doctor correctly entered the best-priced product at the appointment
- what visits the National Health Fund has already paid for and what can I settle with the doctor for
- how many points were made in total by a particular doctor within the framework of the contract
- compare the number of visits (appointments were X, do I have the same number of settlements)
Regards,
Maciej