Variable VAT rate for resold cosmetics
Katarzyna Słupska
Please add a function that allows you to change the VAT rate for products sold, as is currently the case with added treatment procedures.
We want the receptionist to be able to choose the VAT rate for a given product on her own at each sale.
The addition of variable VAT rates (ZW, 8% and 23%) will allow entities providing medical services to resell products on preferential terms in accordance with Article 43 (1) of the Law on Goods and Services Tax.
The possibility of changing the VAT rate at the time of sale is important to us because the sale of the same product may have a ZW rate (if the product issued is closely related to the treatment performed) or, for example, 23% if the sale is made outside the visit. Hence, a rigid definition of VAT to a product is inappropriate for us and carries a tax risk - we cannot account for the ZW of products that are sold outside the visit, so we ask that you be able to add the option to choose VAT at each possible sale.
J
Jakub
I ask for 3 examples of services along with products that are closely related to the treatment and those that are not related. This will help us implement this function.
S
Skalska Veronika
Jakub is not that every service always requires selling a specific product every time. It cannot be rigidly defined. It may turn out that with a given service, the specialist will recommend product X and it will be related to therapy, so it will be on ZW, and other times with this service the specialist will recommend product Y, which will not be strictly related to therapy, so its VAT according to the law will be 8 or 23%. The VAT of the product depends on the circumstances, i.e. on whether a given product is closely related to the treatment/therapy performed, but the same product can be purchased by the patient in circumstances outside the visit, or on the occasion of the visit of his child, for example, and then the VAT must be 8 or 23%. Therefore, in our opinion, the option with the ability to edit VAT at settlement would be the most convenient. As it is today with the billing of the service. A person who has the right to be on the ZW leaves the ZW, but specialists who charge for the same service, but not having grounds for exemption, charge it with 8 or 23% VAT. Such a solution would be ideal, because then it is the person who accounts for the patient who verifies whether the basis of ZW or Vat is to be 8/ 23%. The gross value for the patient remains the same, but the VAT must vary depending on the circumstances.